10 reasons to model XML with RELAX NG , not W3C XML Schema (://URLFAN)
Discover what websites bloggers are mentioning right now.
Reading 1,682,448 feeds, parsing 106,198,007 posts, ranking 2,815,144 domains.
Lookup a website
Article Structure
43 paragraphs
8599 characters
0 images
14 outgoing links

10 reasons to model XML with RELAX NG , not W3C XML Schema

Post Date: Jul 26, 2007 2:05 a.m.
Ranked website: griffinbrown.co.uk ()

For full text please visit source:
http://www.griffinbrown.co.uk/blog/PermaLink.aspx?guid=9aebb083-a961-4...


I have recently recommended to a large publishing client that they adopt RELAX NG as the basis of the formal definitions of their content, in preference to W3C XML Schema Definition Language (WXS). There are lots of individual bits of information on why RELAX NG should be preferred all over the web. Here is an attempt to condense some of the key information into ten points … 1. A better spec means better interoperability We, in common with many people working with WXS schemas, have been tripped up by interoperability problems caused by different tools having a different take on how WXS should be implemented. Even Microsoft, a developer who in generally sympathetic to WXS, has reported a number of interoperabilty problems, and that for its customers WXS had “stuffed up the ready interoperability they thought they were buying into with XML”. [1] The root of such interoperability problems is that the WXS specification is notoriously hard to i...

Content suppressed by ://URLFAN, for full article visit source

Buzz Words mentioned in article:

No buzz words were found in article
How popular is www.griffinbrown.co.uk?

Click here to view stats and graphs for griffinbrown.co.uk


More posts from www.griffinbrown.co.uk

Microsoft Moves to Support ODF Standard
From: griffinbrown.co.uk
Post Date: 2008-05-21 22:18:45

So the rumours were true – Microsoft has announced that the next version of their Office suite will have native support for the OpenDocument Format (ODF). The recently standardised OOXML format will, it seems, be likely to play second fiddle representing the “legacy” of MS Office document that the world has accumulated to date. Conformance Microsoft have over the years gathered a deserved reputation as being one of the worst software companies in the world at respec... more
ODF validation for the cognoscenti
From: griffinbrown.co.uk
Post Date: 2008-05-04 06:40:14

Just when it seemed like nobody was interested in the ODF conformance smoke test posted a few days ago, IBM’s Rob Weir weighs in with a lengthy piece in response. Rob replicates the test I ran and runs a few of his own, finding ODF validation problems along the way and ending with an eyebrow-raising take on this which, I think, sells ODF seriously short. But before getting to that, a few technical things need to be put straight. Is the ODF schema broken? One of the ... more
ODF 1.0 and OpenOffice.org: a conformance smoke test
From: griffinbrown.co.uk
Post Date: 2008-04-30 04:50:15

Following on from the recent smoke test of Office 2007 conformance to ISO/IEC 29500 here, as promised, is a repeat of the exercise using ISO/IEC 26300 (ODF 1.0). Like OOXML, ODF has (sensibly) a schema defined using RELAX NG (ISO/IEC 19757-2). This schema is published in the standard itself and is available for download from OASIS. ODF Schema Woes The first problem encountered was in trying to use this schema. Both James Clark’s jing and Sun’s Mult... more
Up here where the air is clear
From: griffinbrown.co.uk
Post Date: 2008-04-23 01:26:54

Empire State Building To New York for three days of client meetings. With an afternoon free, and very pleasant weather what better way to spend time than taking a trip up the Empire State Building (the sign in the lobby said "visibility: 10 miles"). Pigeons on the 86th floor How nice to have three days of purely commercial work stretching ahead, with no OOXML or standards politics in sight. There is a certain clarity to doing technical work in an environment... more


Next Article | Previous Article


Feeds and posts are not affliated with ://URLFAN. They are displayed here simply for informational purposes, if you would like to remove your feed, posts, or domain from ranking and analysis, please contact us.

://URLFAN (.15 G.Oct 11 08 14:47)
Contact Us - About ://URLFAN - Notify me when my site is added or updated. Add my RSS feed to ://URLFAN