The most maddening thing, of course, is that during the Quiet Times, my traffic went up about twelve percent. Obviously I should post less.
So why start again? Well, for one thing, the old database, with seven thousand and odd items, was getting cranky. For another, it’s not like anything is missing: all the old posts are still archived and are available at their original URLs. And the last time I ran an export of said database, it clipped off at the 18-MB point for some reason, meaning that if I reimported it, I’d have to port over a couple months’ worth of entries anyway, and I’ve already put enough work into this thing.
However, my string of consecutive days with posts remains intact. (It’s at 2,266, if anyone cares, and why should you?)
Stuff from the old templates will be gradually reintroduced. Right now, I just want to get moving again.
My thanks to Liz Lubowitz, at whose designs I sneaked a peek, and to Melody,...
Content suppressed by ://URLFAN, for full article visit source
A perspective on recent site eventsFrom: dustbury.com
Post Date: 2006-09-07 05:09:51
I posted this at, um, a dating site:
"I just lost the database with 7200 blog posts."
Oh, that’s bad.
"No, that’s good. All the original posts are archived, and the site will run much more quickly now without all that dead weight."
Oh, that’s good.
"No, that’s bad. It plays hell with the continuity, especially if you have an regular audience."
Oh, that’s bad.
"No, that’s good. At least they can’t take me for g...
more Just a reminderFrom: dustbury.com
Post Date: 2006-09-06 18:58:43
A couple weeks’ worth of old posts in the archives still have comment windows, because I haven’t yet gone in to edit them out; however, the windows don’t work anymore, so if you’re getting glared at by MT if you try, that’s why.
Eventually I’ll get around to cleaning that stuff up and putting up a page of archive links. ( Update: You can now access all the old archives, by category or by month, here. )
In fact, I was seriously thinking of...
more