Pennsylvania Primary: what are the good reasons and what are the bad reasons to vote for either Dem candidate?

... Content suppressed by ://URLFAN, for full article visit source ...

Just a nod to the fact that a majority of my readers are US voters, some of them are in Pennsylvania, and the polls have not yet closed. It’s still the 22nd over there.

It’s a no-brainer that with all the animosity between the two campaigns, there are people who have become intransigent and who are voting for their candidate for BAD reasons, primarily the foo-isms. It’s also a no-brainer that either candidate would make a better President than John McCain: they both have strong positives to offer and there are GOOD reasons to vote for either Obama or Clinton. Not everybody who will vote for the Other Candidate is doing so for foo-ist reasons.

If I were a US citizen? First, I would definitely be voting for the Democratic candidate in November no matter who ends up winning the nomination at the Party convention (and the margin is much closer than when other primary races, both Democratic and Republican, have gone toe-to-toe until the convention).

... Content suppressed by ://URLFAN, for full article visit source ...

2. Reproductive Choice: Clinton is rock-solid. Read that linked transcript - Obama wants to find “common ground” with anti-abortion zealots.

(ETA: I overlooked the H/T to Kate Harding)