Proof that movie critics matter (://URLFAN)
Discover what websites bloggers are referencing right now.
Reading 1,399,175 feeds, parsing 97,861,880 posts, ranking 2,815,144 domains.
Lookup a domain name

Feed
blogs.creativeloafing.com

Site Ranks
#28477 of 2,815,144

Post Category

Post Date
Jul 03, 2008 2:05 p.m.

Article Structure
6 paragraphs
2662 characters
6 images
3 outgoing links

Sites mentioned
in article
(click for rank details):

slate.com
rottentomatoes.com
blogs.creativeloafing.com

Proof that movie critics matter

Source: http://blogs.creativeloafing.com/blurbex/2008/07/0...

Displaying mentions in this article, for full text please visit source.
Show me items relating to: Erik Lundegaard

... Content suppressed by ://URLFAN, for full article visit source ...

That’s mostly true for Hollywood’s big-budget releases, but as Erik Lundegaard points out in making the case that we need movie critics, these arbiters of taste have a measurable effect on box-office receipts.

Using basic math and the compendium of critical reviews from Rottentomatoes, Lundegaard shows that across the board — from art-house flicks to major studio releases — better-reviewed films earn more on a per-screen average than movies that are panned. Of 234 films released in 2007 and reviewed on Rottentomatoes, Lundegaard discovers:

... Content suppressed by ://URLFAN, for full article visit source ...

With that in mind, here’s a link to my review for Hancock.

Feeds and posts are not affliated with ://URLFAN. They are displayed here simply for informational purposes, if you would like to remove your feed, posts, or domain from ranking and analysis, please contact us.

://URLFAN (.15 G.Sep 08 08 04:42)
Contact Us - About ://URLFAN - Notify me when my site is added or updated.