Fred Cummins asked
the question last week: Why Should BPMN Support Choreography?
I may be wrong but I believe that BPDM started to support the concept
of choreography under the momentum of Antoine Lonjon who was actively
participating in the UN/CEFACT BPSS working group in the early 2000s.
Having been one of the editor of the OASIS ebBP 2.0.4 (and UN/CEFACT
BPSS 1.1) and worked on BPSS from 1999 to 2005, I may have an opinion or two on the question. Of course I
have already clearly explained my opinions
here
on the relationship between BPMN, BPEL and Choreographies.
I generally highly respect the work coming out of the OMG, BPDM is no
exception. This is the best "standards" organization and a lot of
other standards organization could learn a thing or two on specification
development processes. That being said, I am not sure the BPDM working
group is really clear about what they are attempting to do.
Requir...
Content suppressed by ://URLFAN, for full article visit source
[Hollywood] Greg the architectFrom: ebpml.org
Post Date: 2007-09-23 00:00:00
I often thought that I had seen it all, that there was no bottom below the bottom. Enterprise Software is the prototypical example of "wealthy cluelessness". They are loaded, sometimes, it’s sickening how much money flows through them with the benevolence of some CIOs. When money is of no concern, some vendors reach the promised LaLaLand where everything you do makes sense, every product you make will finds buyers, where product management and product marketing replace customer focus with ...
more 
Websites mentioned in article
Buzz Words mentioned in article:
How popular is www.ebpml.org?
