 Article Structure 4 paragraphs 1020 characters 0 images 2 outgoing links There’s no base like foam
Post Date: Jul 19, 2008 5:49 p.m.
Ranked website: dustbury.com (Ranks #17771 of 2,815,144)
For full text please visit source: http://www.dustbury.com/backlog/2008/07/theres_no_base_like_f.html
For the 70th anniversary of MGM’s The Wizard of Oz Warner Bros. and Swarovski have commissioned twenty designers to update the Ruby Slippers; the actual shoes they produce will then be auctioned off, proceeds to go to the Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS Foundation.
Among the designers: Betsey Johnson, Oscar de la Renta, Diane von Fürstenberg, Manolo Blahnik (yes!) and Christian Louboutin and Gwen Stefani, who these days has more of a rep as a fashionista than as a singer.
At one level, the prospect is frightening: for all I know, there may be sparkly Crocs in the offing. Still, those slippers are as iconic as a Chanel jacket or Schiaparelli’s prototype skort; the temptation to "improve" on the original is no doubt irresistible. Content suppressed by ://URLFAN, for full article visit source
Buzz Words mentioned in article:No buzz words were found in article How popular is www.dustbury.com?Click here to view stats and graphs for dustbury.com
More posts from www.dustbury.com
A perspective on recent site eventsFrom: dustbury.com Post Date: 2006-09-07 05:09:51 I posted this at, um, a dating site:
"I just lost the database with 7200 blog posts."
Oh, that’s bad.
"No, that’s good. All the original posts are archived, and the site will run much more quickly now without all that dead weight."
Oh, that’s good.
"No, that’s bad. It plays hell with the continuity, especially if you have an regular audience."
Oh, that’s bad.
"No, that’s good. At least they can’t take me for granted."
[this coul... more  Just a reminderFrom: dustbury.com Post Date: 2006-09-06 18:58:43 A couple weeks’ worth of old posts in the archives still have comment windows, because I haven’t yet gone in to edit them out; however, the windows don’t work anymore, so if you’re getting glared at by MT if you try, that’s why.
Eventually I’ll get around to cleaning that stuff up and putting up a page of archive links. (Update: You can now access all the old archives, by category or by month, here.)
In fact, I was seriously thinking of chunking... more  Is this thing on?From: dustbury.com Post Date: 2006-09-06 18:10:41 The most maddening thing, of course, is that during the Quiet Times, my traffic went up about twelve percent. Obviously I should post less.
So why start again? Well, for one thing, the old database, with seven thousand and odd items, was getting cranky. For another, it’s not like anything is missing: all the old posts are still archived and are available at their original URLs. And the last time I ran an export of said database, it clipped off at the 18-MB point for some reason, me... more  Feed me, see moreFrom: dustbury.com Post Date: 2006-09-07 11:56:55 I think I have the RSS thingamajig working now. The URL has changed, however: it’s now at http://www.dustbury.com/index.xml.
Is there any interest in an Atom feed? If so, I’ll see if I can work one up.
(Title stolen from the Oklahoma Gazette.)... more
Next Article | Previous Article
Feeds and posts are not affliated with ://URLFAN. They are displayed here simply for informational purposes, if you would like to remove your feed, posts, or domain from ranking and analysis, please contact us.
|