Post at Darwiniana on Buddhism, a slightly different perspective from what we are doing here, but usefully complementary. It is hard to critique gurus because they are won’t yield up to the standard scientific cliches on religion.
Content suppressed by ://URLFAN, for full article visit source
Comment on RawlinsonFrom: gurdjieff-con.net
Post Date: 2008-09-13 20:01:46
I am putting this comment up for a post, since I would certainly toss in the towel on the accuracy of
Rawlinson./nemo/nemini
Willow:
Hello Nemo, All very interesting but not accurate as with many sholarly type texts, they are often copied from other inaccurate sources but accepted as gospel by accademia or whoever.
I will give you an example of how grossly inaccurate part of this text is.
An example of this is the text mentions Paul Twitchell the founder of Eckankar as passing someone ...
more /gmancon series upgrade and a selection from WHEEFrom: gurdjieff-con.net
Post Date: 2008-09-13 17:16:37
I need to upgrade the /gmancon series, which I wrote in one day just to get it on paper, and one aspect of that set of essays that might be of interest is the treatment of the eonic effect. Here’s a short selection from World History And The Eonic Effect from Darwiniana.
Rhyme and Reason
One of the great confusions of the modern New Age movement is the quest for the ‘New Age’ beyond mdoernity, an age that doesn’t exist.
The arrogance of the many gurus is consid...
more